So what did Roberts get right? The state of the union had degenerated into a political pep rally. It likely always was. However I am frustrated when watching it (something I haven't done for a while since I started to notice this) because I am tired of
Roberts also got it right that the state of the union has been used to attack the other side. However this isn't something that is new. It seems like he thinks this is some kind of new development, no it has been done for a long time. However that being said if I was president I would not use it to attack the judicial branch (Robert's biggest point) or congress. Whether you like it or not the supreme court actually probably did the correct thing according to the law, frustration should be leveled at congress who can't seem to write a simple bill that accomplishes the stated goal because they are too busy making it longer than war and peace. Simple laws people, simple.
However, I feel like Roberts also got it wrong. This doesn't seem to be a justice stating an obvious fact. It seems more like a conservative playing to his base. Alabama is largely republican and he is and was appointed by a republican. It doesn't seem like this is anymore than another trite attack of one side on the other. Perhaps he should be more concentrated on upholding the consitution in his court and less on how other branches bicker. (The executive branch could use the same advice as well.)
No comments:
Post a Comment
Comments will be deleted if they are inappropriate.